USA TODAY
Powered by  
 
Click Here to Print
 SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close 
 
 
Bill should die by veto
As a practicing physician and two-time cancer survivor, I am intrigued by the potential of embryonic stem cell research. However, liberalizing President Bush's stem cell policy would be both unethical and unnecessary.

The bill Majority Leader Bill Frist recently endorsed would, for the first time, direct the federal government to use taxpayer dollars to destroy human embryos. This proposal is based on a false hope. Not a single treatment has been developed from embryonic stem cells. Yet more than 60 treatments have been developed from stem cells in umbilical cord blood and adult tissues.

Scientists will likely arrive at the same destination — and cures — without needing to go down the path of taxpayer-funded research that destroys human life. Researchers are close to obtaining stem cells that behave just as embryonic stem cells do without destroying human embryos in the process.

I've introduced legislation in the Senate to fund this promising avenue of research. Congress should pursue alternatives that offer all of the benefits of embryonic stem cell research but do not open a Pandora's box of ethical problems.

At the dawn of what will likely be the biotech century, advocating taxpayer-funded destructive experimentation on human embryos that will be "thrown away anyway" would set us on a dangerous course. If human life is sacred, but not worthy of protection when it is unwanted or destined for destruction, then many human lives, like those of the terminally ill or severely handicapped, would be cheapened and endangered.

This test also moves us closer to a brave new world of human cloning and fetal farms. Why not create human beings for experimentation or spare organs if they would otherwise be cast aside?

Twelve years ago, then-president Bill Clinton permitted research on discarded fetal tissue from abortion clinics because he was told that it was the best avenue to reach vital cures. No cures were produced. Today, supporters of embryonic stem cell research are making similar claims.

Congress can help scientists realize the promise of embryonic stem cell research without authorizing the destruction of human life in the process. The president would be wise to veto this legislation.

Sen. Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma, maintains a family medicine and obstetrics practice in Muskogee.

 
 
 
Find this article at:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-08-03-oppose_x.htm
 
Click Here to Print
 SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close 
 Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article.
 
 
Copyright 2009 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.